On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:49:59 -0500, "Stephen Russell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Rick Stahl is mentioned in a bog on deployment issues with .net 3.5.  Oh
> yeah and not nicely.

The criticism looks to me as if it is levelled against someone that
replied to a posting Rick made about the size of .NET 3.5 and the
problems this causes in rolling out applications, not Rick himself.

> Many users are naturally suspicious of anything Microsoft.

That'll be why they're all using Linux then. Oh wait ....

Yeah, the full installer is a chunky 197MB. However, if you run the 3MB
bootstrapper on a user's PC, it will download only what it needs to
bring them up to 3.5 from an earlier version, assuming they have
broadband. Also I don't know how the author distributes his application,
but most people I know would build an installer including the framework,
put it on a network drive at the user's site and install on the
workstations as needed. So why would the users all have to be
downloading the framework in this case? If he's building an
off-the-shelf application then presumably it comes on CD, so put the
installer on that. The only place I can see it being a major issue is if
you were in a web-only distribution model. 
-- 
  Alan Bourke
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to