On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> > I got to busy to replay again.  I was going to explain the verse but
> > other
> > fun stuff was happening over the weekend.  Sorry
>
>
>        C'mon, Steve, I know that you aren't that dense.
>
>        I posted a "sound bite" that, taken out of context, would be fodder
> for the "gotcha" style of Fox News, where they use such isolated clips
> to smear someone. I asked what people would think would happen in this
> case, with the idea that they would realize that this sort of
> "journalism" is nothing but BS.
>
>        Of course you know what the context of that Biblical "clip" was,
> and
> how it makes sense in that context. My point was that you can take the
> practices of Fox News and apply them to *anyone* to make them look bad.
>
>        Take a deep breath. Go back and read my post, and see if you can
> avoid the sort of knee-jerk response long enough to think.


------------------------

 Dude.  It was a joke, and then life got interesting and this web stuff was
not at all important.

My Mash time was over and it was time to start sparging.  Or I was making
Dr. Pepper in the back yard again :)


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to