I've done it myself by cutting and pasting the subject line from an HTML source.

 


--- On Mon, 6/16/08, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] How Leland sends OT to the non-OT list
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, June 16, 2008, 7:18 AM
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> 
> > Your messages are encoded in UTF-8. Did you recently
> change email
> > clients or settings? From   the header:
> >
> > Subject: =?UTF-8?B? 
> >
> UmU6IFtPVF0gSG93IE5lb2NvbnNlcnZhdGl2ZXMgQ29ucXVlcmVkIFc=?=
> >
>       =?UTF-8?B?YXNoaW5ndG9uIOKAkyBhbmQgTGF1bmNoZWQgYSBXYXI=?=
> 
> 
>       Odd... my email log shows it as windows-1252 enocding. I
> wonder if a  
> bunch of encoding/decoding happens as it goes from sender
> client to  
> server to list software to server to receiver client.
> 
> -- Ed Leafe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to