Whoopy, the Supreme Court has held the second amendment to the 
Constitution allows citizen can own and bear arms.

#-----------------------------------

By MARK SHERMAN
The Associated Press
Thursday, June 26, 2008; 10:45 AM

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a 
right to own guns for self-defense and hunting, the justices' first 
major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.

The court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's 
32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the 
Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush 
administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms laws intact.

The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since 
its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: "A well regulated 
militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of 
the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an 
individual's right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is 
somehow tied to service in a state militia.

Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said that an individual 
right to bear arms is supported by "the historical narrative" both 
before and after the Second Amendment was adopted.

The Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns 
held and used for self-defense in the home," Scalia said. The court also 
struck down Washington's requirement that firearms be equipped with 
trigger locks.

In a dissent he summarized from the bench, Justice John Paul Stevens 
wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, 
the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected 
officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."

He said such evidence "is nowhere to be found."

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said, "In my 
view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by 
the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in 
crime-ridden urban areas."

Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel 
Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. The other dissenters were 
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.

The capital's gun law was among the nation's strictest.

Dick Anthony Heller, 66, an armed security guard, sued the District 
after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his home for 
protection in the same Capitol Hill neighborhood as the court.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Heller's 
favor and struck down Washington's handgun ban, saying the Constitution 
guarantees Americans the right to own guns and that a total prohibition 
on handguns is not compatible with that right.

The issue caused a split within the Bush administration. Vice President 
Dick Cheney supported the appeals court ruling, but others in the 
administration feared it could lead to the undoing of other gun 
regulations, including a federal law restricting sales of machine guns. 
Other laws keep felons from buying guns and provide for an instant 
background check.

Scalia said nothing in Thursday's ruling should "cast doubt on 
long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or 
the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in 
sensitive places such as schools and government buildings."

The law adopted by Washington's city council in 1976 bars residents from 
owning handguns unless they had one before the law took effect. Shotguns 
and rifles may be kept in homes, if they are registered, kept unloaded 
and either disassembled or equipped with trigger locks.

Opponents of the law have said it prevents residents from defending 
themselves. The Washington government says no one would be prosecuted 
for a gun law violation in cases of self-defense.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/26/AR2008062600615.html?referrer=email
or
http://tinyurl.com/68cf9a

#----------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to