Possible but not necessarily the truth.

You are pointing out a single individual that held a belief over 60 
years ago.  Was he right?  No idea and, frankly, I don't much care.  He 
served his country admirably and for that I give him my thanks.  What he 
chose to speak about after he retired from the military was his business 
and, thankfully and partially due to what he accomplished during his 
military service, perfectly acceptable in this country.  His speeches 
were presented to pacifist groups and why would that be?  Perhaps 
because they welcomed what he had to say?  If you have a better reason, 
then by all means, let me know.

And I'm unsure just who you are referring to by "illuded conservative 
religious chicken-hawks", certainly not myself but I guess that I could 
be mistaken about that.

::michael

Helio Wakasugui wrote:
> Yes, but this is not the case. You didn't comment because you have
> nothing to say.
> 
> Again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler
> 
> I'm starting to think that iIluded conservative religious
> chicken-hawks are more stupid than marxists.
> 
> HW
> 
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:54 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The iluded chicken-hawks of this didn't make any comment... LOL
>> Some things are just too stupid to comment on.  Happy?  ;-)
>>
>> --
>> Larry Miller
>>
>>
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/mixed
>>  text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>  message/rfc822
>> ---
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to