> Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be > prepared for > the next decade? ;-) >
Cuz I have not seen Cat7 <g>... Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for small network > gigabitrouterrecommendation(CLARIFIED) > > > On Sep 13, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Gil Hale wrote: > > > I have always heard Cat5e was adequate for 1,000mps. But Cat6 could > > not > > hurt, eh? Once all my Cat5e stock is expended I am going to migrate > > to > > Cat6, just because. > > > Why bother with Cat6? Why not go straight to Cat7 and be > prepared for > the next decade? ;-) > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
