Stephen Russell wrote: > TBird needed 1 action to get the spam out marked with the fireball, > and then marek the other 60+ as a fireball and knock that out again. > Way to much time from my POV.
You do realize that the adaptive junk filter is disabled by default, and that you can assign a box for TB to automatically dump spam into? IME once trained, TB's filter is very good. That said, spam fighting should not rely on a single technology. I do most of my spam filtering at the server level, not with the client mail reader. This is a combination of mail header checks, RBL checks, SPF checks, greylisting, and spamassassin bayesian filtering (trained by me in my mail client when I move incoming spam into a special folder). Once my mail gets to TB, there's very rarely anything spammy to deal with at all. I do all my mail filtering at the server level, which is helpful because I use several email clients on several computers, so it doesn't matter what computer I'm at: my messages and folder structure are identical. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
