Bob Calco wrote: Hi Bob!
Why do I have this nagging suspicion that Bernanke and Paulson have a generous portion of that $700 billion earmarked for themselves and/or their cronies? > Also don't forget that Obama is #2 in the Senate in terms of contributions > from Fannie Mae employees. > > Sen. Dodd (another guy with his paws all over this financial crisis who > magically evades all media scrutiny) is #1 having received over the course > of his 20+ year career over $128K in contributions from Fannie Mae. > > In Obama's brief 2 year career he's received a whopping $105K. Wonder if it > has anything to do with these 3 gentlemen being executives there? > > Now these bosses at Fannae Mae are deeply involved in his campaign. And > they're at the heart of this crisis. NYT tried to play interference by > printing the "expose" on the McCain aide who once worked for a company that > received consulting fees from Fannae Mae, as if that somehow tied McCain to > the corruption there--not mentioning the deep connections of Obama's aides > or his status as #2 receiver of Fannae Mae campaign $$$. > > The NYT has basically given up all objectivity and become a PR wing of the > Obama campaign. It's staggering. > > Ah, yes, that's change we can believe in. > > Change like they had recently in Caracas and Moscow. > > - Bob > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Pete Theisen >> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 11:21 PM >> To: ProFox Email List >> Subject: Re: [OT] Just in from the chat mail >> >> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >>> It seems to me that the accounting firm that audited the financial >>> statements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be in a heap of >> trouble. >> >> Hi Leland! >> >> Other documents suggest that audits were never done, at the insistence >> of the people who we are looking at now. Here's a couple related links: >> >> http://housingdoom.com/category/bubble-horror-stories/ >> http://housingdoom.com/2006/12/18/fannie-charges/ >> >> The important question is that these same men are now working in the >> Obama campaign. Did he not check their background or is their >> background >> what makes them interesting to him? >> > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
