http://tinyurl.com/4qllhc

- - -
You can draw plenty of rational inferences from Stanley's rich work.  But
for a clear statement of Ayers's frightening vision, I submit that his
November 2006 speech at the World Education Forum should be required
reading.  

As Cornerites know, I've been arguing that our emphasis on Ayers's prior
terrorism, while highly relevant, is not the essential point.  The real
issue is Ayers's revolutionary leftism (at around the time Ayers and Obama
began working on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, by the way, Ayers
described himself as "a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist"). 

Obama is clearly lying when he claims ignorance about Ayers's terrorism, but
even if you wanted to pretend otherwise, it is impossible that he was in the
dark about Ayers's revolutionary leftism:  Ayers has never made a secret of
it and can't seem to help himself from mentioning it about every 30 seconds.
Obama not only knew about Ayers's views in this regard; he obviously
subscribed to them:  was a member of the Chicago New Party begun by the
Democratic Socialists of America; he worked closely with Ayers on "education
reform" for years, he approved of Ayers's similarly fringe-Left views of the
criminal justice system's treatment of juvenile crime, and, we are learning;
and he was tightly aligned with ACORN, which he and Ayers funded and whose
practices fit comfortably with the Ayers view of "participatory democracy").

In any event, here are excerpts of Ayers's 2006 speech before Hugo Chavez
and other assembled "comrades":

President Hugo Chavez, . invited guests, comrades.  I'm honored and humbled
to be here with you this morning.  I bring greetings and support from your
brothers and sisters throughout Northamerica [sic]!   Welcome to the World
Education Forum.  Amamos la revolucion Bolivariana! ...

[M]y comrade and friend Luis Bonilla, a brilliant educator and inspiring
fighter for justice . has taught me a great deal about the Bolivarian
Revolution [i.e., Chavez's movement] and about the profound educational
reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez.
We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution, and
I've come to appreciate Luis as a major asset in both the Venezuelan and the
international struggle-I look forward to seeing how he and all of you
continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to
create something truly new and deeply humane..  [For more information on the
Venezuelan socialist Luis Bonilla-Montoya, see here.]

 

I began teaching when I was 20 yeas old in a small freedom school affiliated
with the Civil Rights Movement in the United States.  The year was 1965, and
I'd been arrested in a demonstration.  Jailed for ten days, I met several
activists who were finding ways to link teaching and education with deep and
fundamental social change.  They were following Dewey and DuBois, King and
Helen Keller who wrote:  "We can't have education without revolution.  We
have tried peace education for 1,900 years and it has failed.  Let us try
revolution and see what it will do now."

 

I walked out of jail and into my first teaching position-and from that day
until this I've thought of myself as a teacher, but I've also understood
teaching as a project intimately connected with social justice.  After all,
the fundamental message of the teacher is this:  you can change your
life-whoever you are, wherever you've been, whatever you've done, another
world is possible.  As students and teachers begin to see themselves as
linked to one another, as tied to history and capable of collective action,
the fundamental message of teaching shifts slightly, and becomes broader,
more generous:  we must change ourselves as we come together to change the
world.  Teaching invites transformations, it urges revolutions small and
large.  La educacion es revolucion!

 

. [I've] learned that education is never neutral.  It always has a value, a
position, a politics.  Education either reinforces or challenges the
existing social order, and school is always a contested space-what should be
taught?  In what way?  Toward what end?  By and for whom?  At bottom, it
involves a struggle over the essential questions:  what does it mean to be a
human being living in a human society?

 

Totalitarianism demands obedience and conformity, hierarchy, command and
control.  Royalty requires allegiance.  Capitalism promotes racism and
materialism-turning people into consumers, not citizens.  Participatory
democracy, by contrast, requires free people coming together, voluntarily as
equals who are capable of both self-realization and, at the same time, full
participation in a shared political and economic life.

 

. Venezuelans have shown the world that with full participation, full
inclusion, and popular empowerment, the failing of capitalist schooling can
be resisted and overcome.  Venezuela is a beacon to the world in its
accomplishment of eliminating illiteracy in record time, and engaging
virtually the entire population in the ongoing project of education.

 

. [W]e, too, must build a project of radical imagination and fundamental
change.  Venezuela is poised to offer the world a new model of education-a
humanizing and revolutionary model whose twin missions are enlightenment and
liberation.

 

Viva Mission Sucre!

Viva Presidente Chavez!

Viva La Revolucion Bolivariana!

Hasta La Victroria Siempre!
- - -

I only post this since Kristyne fails to see any contemporary relevance to
Obama's relationship with Ayers, because Ayers' achievements as a founding
leader of a violent communist group dedicated to toppling the US government
were, like, so YESTERDAY.

- Bob



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to