They still say Bush stole the election of 2000. "selected not elected"
************************************************* Barack Obama Antichrist gear http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Tue, 10/28/08, MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OT] The refs blew it To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 4:57 PM Ed Leafe wrote: > Good essay that sums up my hunch about the aftermath of the election: > > http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96227978&ft=1&f=1102 > ( -or- http://twurl.nl/pksh5d ) > > Even if Obama were to win every single electoral vote, there is no > way that a large portion of the country will ever accept that > decision. They will continue to whine about the unfairness of it all, > without considering for a moment that every election has a winner and > a loser, and this time they lost. How is that any different than any other past election in recent history? The re-count in that Florida county showed that Bush still had more votes than Gore, yet the same "foul!" was called by the losing side. I think this is the case many times over, regardless of whatever party wins. [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
