Michael Oke, II wrote: > Hastert would hardly qualify as a "new tone" selection either. Are you > trying to tell me that he couldn't have found someone that might > actually have been able to bridge the chasm that exists between the two > parties? > >
I though he did, when he selected Congressman Rahm Emanuel, and btw, who would you suggest? Regards, LelandJ > ::michael > > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> And who would you have picked, former speaker of the house Denis >> Hastert? LOL >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNIqZEDghMU >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> >> Pete Theisen wrote: >> >>> Hi Everybody! >>> >>> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/11/07/obama-already-broken-two-promises-will-media-report >>> >>> or >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/67ug7y >>> >>> "The first broken promise was the one where the candidate of "change" >>> was going to bring a new tone to Washington. This one has been broken by >>> Obama's choice for Chief of Staff: Rahm Emanuel. Representative Emanuel >>> (D- Illinois) is a hard-core, far left, liberal as well as being an old >>> Clinton hack. Not only that, but Emanuel is not a "new tone" kind of guy >>> but is a Pit bull of epic proportions. The parallel would have been >>> McCain claiming a new tone but picking Karl Rove as his Chief of Staff. >>> Emanuel is little different than Terry MCauliffe or Howard Dean in his >>> vehement and vocal attacks on Republicans. So much for the "new tone" >>> Obama claimed he wanted to foster." >>> >>> "And now comes his second broken promise. Politico reported on November >>> 5 that Barack Obama has stepped back from his claim that lobbyists would >>> not have a place in his new administration." >>> >>> >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
