Stephen Russell wrote: > If you are using the dbc why not go against that as your source?
Um...that was in the op....it's all free tables. > > other way is to brute force it: > > adir() for any .dbfs > > for loop to see if you can open the table and get a reccount form it. yep...that's the current plan. Another vote for this option! THanks. > to bad your not in a diff backend because you would just query it for > content, instead of looking for forgotten gems and all <bad Steve> Um...yeah. DotNet! (wiping koolaid passed from Steve off face...<g>) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1665.69.251.251.31.1231811177.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
