On Sat, January 24, 2009 7:27 pm, Michael Madigan wrote: > Gee, I thought he wanted to get along with European countries. > > > http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5igKGopxWlT9SgXvlsDg_2z > KcNlrw
I must be reading/interpreting this wrong: so why are U.S. funds being sent overseas to fund abortions? Forget about the centerpoint (abortions). Why are we paying for foreign persons services? What about taking care of our own people and fixing the problems here first? For example, if there were 2 charities--one here in my native country, and one in a foreign country, who's cause should be funded first? Yeah...everyone would say his own native country. I wouldn't expect the Brits (or ANY nation) to pay for our stuff before their own? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/63180.69.7.77.20.1233157192.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
