Paul McNett wrote: > > You need to allow the domain users read, write, and execute permission on the > updatable exe file. Is that such a bad compromise? >
With the particular client, it might be. He wasn't interested in web update, because he "couldn't control it." IOW, this is one of those instances where "because the client says so." I'm hoping he'll get fed up enough with updates to let us use a loader, but I'm not losing any sleep over it. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
