Allen Pollard wrote: > I think its a shame all that stuff was not taken out to make it leaner. I > know about backward compatibility but dont care.
The stuff is relic, but that was one of VFP's *strong points* -- that it HAD backward compatibility. Yes, it could be leaner if that wasn't in it, but is VFP bloated now? Certainly not compared to the latest offering from M$. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3639.69.251.251.31.1236437782.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
