MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > Why might "not free" be a good thing? > Some open sourced languages have ambiguous licensing that might prevent you from creating closed source/commercial software. Many, many others have very clear licensing where you are free to create open or closed source applications. Python is an example with a clearly defined license to it for both closed and open. RB has a clear license in that you are free to create open source applications or commercial applications as well. > Are these the elitest or very short fuse type who loved to push the RTFM > button? > I would say "short fuse" type of people. Most of the issues appear small to me and are a problem in upgrading from a (very) old version to the latest version may involve some refactoring. Perhaps we're (VFP crowd) is such a group of old farts and VFP is such a stable product that we know a lot of what to avoid and where the pain points are. Overall the RB team and RB developers are a very friendly, sharing, generous crowd.
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a5b773c.1010...@cullytechnologies.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
