Why should this produce a 'Numeric Overflow'? I would expect it to return
390.
?VAL("390E 390TX")
It is translating the 'E' to exponential with the following numeric to its
exponent.
What would your suggestions be to just evaluate the leading numeric?
Thanks folks!
Francis I. Coppage, Jr.
-- "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not
sure about the universe."
... Albert Einstein
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/039801ca1855$55e099b0$01a1cd...@net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
