> > I don't, but for those of you still under the law of sin, obviously, > his > > obsession with sexual imagery is relevant. > > > Nah... that's for you repressed blokes. I get the real thing, not the > imagery. :-)
Oh, you're such a stud. As Jean in one of his more verbose outbursts might opine, "Yawn..." > > Well, that's progress. Before the excuse was "She made me this way, > so I did > > the noble thing and left". > > > Nope, that was YOUR interpretation of my words. Shit! You christians > have always issues with interpretation of other people's words, don't > you? It has even provoked a couple of schisms. No great gift of interpretation or specialized hermeneutic is required to see through your verbal song and dance. You godless heathen like to dance and duck around your own words. :) > > Ah, THAT would make you feel special. At least we're getting to the > bottom > > of your self-loathing problem. > > > YES, YES, I confess!!! I loathe myself! boooohoooooo.......... 8-) You don't, but you should. :) > > > > Well, but the deeper issue is whence the violent temper? You'll be > chopping > > off all kinds of limbs for offending you, even a few of your own, > till you > > deal square with that. > > > Nah! I like it that way. Live by the chainsaw, ... you know the rest. > > One day, that little temper of yours is going to hurt something > besides an > > appliance, while you continue to seek refuge in the pleasures of the > flesh. > > > Wrong again! You are too literary. I seek pleasure in the "pleasures of > the flesh". No need to seek for anything else.... oh yeah, I also GIVE > pleasure, but that's way over your head, so let's not go there. Yeah, just look at the TV. > > Pete's a good guy, even if he is a latter day socialist. I don't > think > > you're much less misogynous than you claim he is, you're just more > > hormonally in tune with your animal instincts and far more likely to > let > > them override your cerebral cortex. > > > I'm not in tune with my animal instincts, and they don't override my > cerebral cortex. I AM an animal so the instincts are part of ME, and > therefore they don't need to override anything. Oh, and Pete's an ass. > Ask any woman and she'll tell you. You are more than an animal, but until you grasp that, you'll never realize anything more than an animal existence. Good luck with that. > > > I can't imagine Pete swatting a fly (which is probably why he was so > > impressed when Obama did it), much less nearly hitting a woman and > busting a > > 32" TV with his bare hands. > > > There you go again. And now raising false testimony. I did not "nearly" > hit a woman, I meant to hit the TV and I did. And wow! The "bare hands" > part was a nice touch! So what kept you from hitting her? The TV did not make you angry. Whence, from such an admitted animal as yourself, did some notion of the strong being *wrong* to attack the weak come? Didn't the bitch deserve it, exasperating you so, but you displaced your righteous wrath on the defenseless inanimate TV? Talk about hypocrisy! I'm an immoralist, a sensualist, a seeker and giver of great pleasure, an ANIMAL, I am beholden to no Christian ideals... But I abhor the strong harming the weak. Where did that sentiment come from? You remind me of Hollywierd liberals who profess great love for the poor, even vote for politicians promising to sock it to the rich... but they all have their tax shelters and no compunction of conscience about stealing millions from the poor in the theatres. > > No, more like treat others as you'd have them treat you. Since you > already > > treat me this way, and I reciprocate, it would almost be impossible > for > > either of us to violate the Golden Rule, unless one of us was a 32" > TV. > > > You mean you would have me treat you this way? You are into masochism > now? LOL Well I was just observing the fact that our OT relationship doesn't exactly follow the Marcus of Queensbury rules, or elenchus in the purely Socratic sense. :) > > > See, I finally display a little genuine Christian charity, and this > is how > > he treats me. LOL! > > > Told you Bobby, you're the christian here. I cant be, I just dislike > hypocrisy too much. So much that you give great pleasure in perfecting it! > But it's an interesting concept of christian behaviour that you think > you are free to exercise your hatred on people who don't feel subjected > to your rules.... and as always :-) Jeez time for another patented Jean "yawn" or "sigh". I feel free to exercise my right to free speech, and I feel free to use whatever literary talents I have (or don't) in the expression thereof; but I don't hate anybody. If I hated you, for example, I'd hardly engage in such prolonged dialogues with you on matters of life and faith. - Bob > > Cheers > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
