Stephen Russell wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Everybody, >> >> Docs disagree on need for flu vaccine. Is it worth the risk? What is to >> be gained, other than drug profits? Evidently not a whole lot. >> >> http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/19/The-Truth-about-the-Flu-Shot.aspx
> Not sure I believe a fish oil salesman as "the truth and only answer" > to this problem. > > Were his stats skewed by "his" population? He never mentioned where > his #s came from with respect to Virologists. Or did I miss that? > Some of his page is blocked by content type here at work. Hi Stephen, My perception is colored by the fact that the 70s swine flu shot made me sick. I haven't had a flu shot since, and I never get the flu. You are right, Mercola sells a lot of stuff on his website. He does come off as slick. Docs generally generalize. You press them for specifics and they will say it is in the journals. You either take their word or read the journals, which cost hundreds per year. Maybe you can find the journals in the library but who has the time. Can't overhaul the system. All the information is somebody's property, somebody who wants to be M$ type rich. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
