On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 14:14, Rick Schummer <[email protected]> wrote: > Garrett, > >>> The old version of the app works fine, so it's presumably a change > between VFP7 (I think) and VFP9.<< > > Is the view based on a different view(s) (not a table)? VFP 9 no longer > requeries the underlying view of the view. You have to requery() the > underlying view programmatically before requerying the current view if this > is the architecture.
I think that this is the case here -- while it works opening the table manually, it's definitely worth giving this a try. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
