Gene,
My experience is somewhat similar. I have still had the memory usage up and
the consequent "we are sorry...there was a problem" message but not half as
much as with 3.7. The real thing that seems to screw it up is Flash after a
while it just goes mental and I wonder whether this is a flash problem as
opposed to a Firefox problem, but there you go.

On a slightly different tack, the new Google Chrome is much, much slicker
than the older version and it certainly seems to be coming up on the rails
as a browser contender now that there are addons available.

Dave Crozier


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Gene Wirchenko
Sent: 03 February 2010 04:38
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [NF] Firefox 3.6 Memory Use

Dear Vixens and Reynards:

      Firefox 3.5.6 (and earlier versions) had memory issues.  Over 
time, it would nibble memory.  Task Manager showed it once as having 
just over 591,000K and during the subsequent termination, it got to 
just over 600,000K.  This was on my 1GB system.

      Firefox 3.6 appears to be acting better, but had about 1/2 GB 
recently.  It seems to have gone down by itself to about 1/3 GB.

      Does anyone know why?  I am wondering if VFP is involved as it 
is the other program running on my system that will take all it can get.

      What are your experiences with Firefox 3.6?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9623b16c9491470990b4f23010752...@develop
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to