Allen wrote: > Have you run the code twice, it must be open > Al > > -----Original Message----- > From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On > Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC > Sent: 16 March 2010 23:51 > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: How could this error happen? (VFP9SP1 free tables on LAN) > > Here's the code: > > nID = erl_sub.idnum > sele a.pmf, a.mu_date, b.date, b.time,; > b.sesid, .F. as SesXRec, a.attmark; > from seats a, sessions b; > where a.sesid = b.sesid; > and a.erlsubid = nID; > and b.date > dNewStop; > union select c.pmf, c.mu_date, b.date, b.time,; > b.sesid, .T. as SesXRec, 0 as attmark; > from sessionx c, sessions b; > where c.sesid = b.sesid; > and c.erlsubid = nID; > and b.date > dNewStop; > into cursor TempSes > > > Often users are getting "Error 24 - Alias name is already in use." How > can that be? If cursor TempSes existed already, wouldn't it just be > overwritten? If this perhaps due to some other area of code having a > temporary DBF open called TempSes?
Even if it's open, shouldn't the subsequent runs just overwrite what's already created? -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ba03775.9000...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
