|| Find me the clause in the Constitution that gives the President or Congress these powers.||
Find me the ones where they are PROHIBITED. See there is an entire supreme court and literally thousands of senior constitutional lawyers who I am guessing know more about it than you. And they don't think that. Thats kinda a clue... Time for you to come to Australia and experience the warmth and the freedom and the.. employment. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Publius Maximus Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2010 12:34 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Impeach the President On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:59 PM, geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > || What the government is doing now in the name of "saving" all these > failures is not merely illegal and frankly unconstitutional, it's > immoral.|| > > this is why your rants are ignored so often. LOL. Right. Sure. > It is neither illegal nor > unconstitutional (fact) and 'immoral' is a subjective assessment. Find me the clause in the Constitution that gives the President or Congress these powers. > When Bush > left office your economy was looking 50/50 at a DEPRESSION. Under Obama it > avoided depression. Delayed by smoke and mirrors at best, and more like made the one that's coming much, much, much worse. > History will record that fact which while it will > undoubtedly stick in your partisan craw remains true. LOL >The cost was huge, but > the price of failure far higher. BS. You can't even put the staggering and constantly inflating cost to come in numbers expressible without greek symbols. > And the blame is well spread around both > republicans and democrats alike. But the job of avoiding it was given to one > man - a democrat. Get over it. He succeeded. No, he hasn't. A fact that will be evident even to your damaged mind soon enough. - Publius > > -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
