iPhone does better I believe. Are you feeling better?
Sent from my iPhone Stephen Russell 901.246-0159 On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:17 PM, "Peter Hart" <ph...@peterhartcomputers.co.uk > wrote: > No one has mentioned the problem I am having at the moment because > of my accident and then subsequent heart attack I am spending a > great deal of time reading emails on my Blackberry. If some one > bottom posts then most of the time the email cuts out before it gets > to the message. ProFox emails are very welcome reading when I am in > a hospital waiting room. > > Cheers > > Peter > Peter Hart Computers. > > -----Original Message----- > From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On > Behalf Of Nicholas Geti > Sent: 25 March 2010 17:02 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [NF] Just got strange request from boss. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ricardo Aráoz" <ricar...@gmail.com> > To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:44 PM > Subject: Re: [NF] Just got strange request from boss. > > >> Yes, your position is understandable for a mail address at work >> dedicated only to office mails. But if you are subscribed to 7 to 10 >> different mail lists, plus personal mails, plus work related mails >> you >> will certainly need a reminder of what was going on in the thread. In >> that case the norm is to hover over the thread cited in the mail till >> you get to the actual message. Of course you get the lazy a**es who >> won't take the 1/2 a second needed to trim, and then you get enormous >> amounts of cited text. >> But you can certainly read your cited text and my answer within a >> screen >> with no need for scrolling. > > I usually just park the threads I am interested in without reading > them. I > treat them more like a database so that later when I need to know > something > I use search techniques to find the information. Saves a huge amount > of > time. > >> >>> In addition most of the emails on this forum are so much fluff. >>> When I do >>> find a thread that is highly technical and I want to learn it, I >>> will >>> spend >>> the time scrolling up and down and clipping text to put it together >> <spam trimmed> >>> . In that case it matters not >>> at all to me what order exists. >>> >> So you don't care to spend half an hour making sense of text but >> you do >> care for half a second trimming. >> > > Because I park the threads I don't spend more than a few seconds > with them. > Then later once my search turns up a topic I am interested in, I > will spend > ten or fifteen minutes studying the thread. But due to lack of > trimming I > pick the latest message and usually get what I want without too much > fuss. > Most messages are small enough that I can pick up the sense no > matter what > direction it runs. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/237be832-08be-4bd9-9410-a8f3e0656...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
