Alan Greenspan, former Federal Reserve Chairman, defends himself 
beautifully before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.  From the 
New York Times:

#----------------------------------
Thursday, April 8, 2010

Greenspan deflects blame for crisis 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/08/greenspan-links-fannie-freddie-to-crisis/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_must-read-stories-today#>

By Patrice Hill

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on Wednesday testified 
that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac played a critical role 
in fostering an explosion of growth in the subprime-mortgage market that 
led to the global financial crisis.

In his first appearance officially defending his own role in the crisis 
before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Mr. Greenspan deflected 
the blame from himself and the central bank - which had broad but 
largely unused authority to regulate banks and the mortgage market - 
while giving voice to long-standing charges by Republicans that 
congressional meddling with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was a critical 
factor in the run-up to the crisis that brought down the global economy 
in the fall of 2008.

Fannie and Freddie, while under strict federal control since a 
government takeover in September 2008, have escaped efforts at reform in 
Congress, though they are fast becoming the biggest beneficiaries of 
taxpayer bailouts with $125 billion in cash infusions so far. Moreover, 
their growing and potentially unlimited liabilities are not likely to be 
recovered through repayments like those from big banks and Wall Street 
firms in the past year.

In detailing the role of the mortgage monoliths in the crisis, Mr. 
Greenspan pointed to the mandates Fannie and Freddie received in 2000 
from Congress and the Clinton-era Housing and Urban Development 
Department to make housing more affordable to minorities and people with 
blemished credit by using their vast resources to purchase more 
subprime-mortgage securities.

As the mortgage giants started to scarf up the subprime securities, much 
of which had been engineered by Wall Street firms to earn AAA ratings, 
the subprime market grew rapidly. It burgeoned from less than 2.5 
percent of the mortgage market in 2000 to encompass 40 percent of 
Fannie's and Freddie's more than $5 trillion mortgage portfolios by 
2004, Mr. Greenspan said.

The enormous appetite for subprime mortgages that Fannie and Freddie 
brought to the market is the reason that interest rates on mortgages 
fell so dramatically in the mid-2000s and many exotic and risky loans 
were created to satisfy the heightened demand for mortgage investments, 
Mr. Greenspan said. That, in turn, gave birth to the most abusive loans 
with low initial "teaser" rates and no requirements for down payments or 
income documentation.

"A significant proportion of the increased demand for 
subprime-mortgage-backed securities during the years 2003 to 2004 was 
effectively politically mandated," he said, adding that the full extent 
of the mortgage enterprises' investments in risky loans was not known 
until September, when a large portion of what had been classified as 
"prime" mortgages in their portfolios was revealed to be subprime.

While much of the riskiest subprime securities were purchased directly 
from Wall Street by European investment funds drawn by high yields and 
low default rates during the housing boom, Fannie and Freddie proved to 
be the best conduit for rapidly growing demand from more conservative 
investors in Asia for U.S. mortgage investments.

Fannie and Freddie first issued their own debt, which had an implicit 
government guarantee that appealed to the Asian investors, and then used 
the cash to invest in subprime loans, in a process that Mr. Greenspan 
often criticized at the time as over-acquisitiveness aimed at dominating 
the mortgage market.

"The subprime market grew rapidly in response," he said, and "subprime 
loan standards deteriorated rapidly," worsening an investment bubble 
that was already developing in the housing market.

Mr. Greenspan, whose views are still closely followed in financial 
markets though he left the Fed more than four years ago, spurned 
repeated assertions by members of the commission that the Fed's own low 
interest rate policies in 2003 were what nurtured the housing bubble.

"The house-price bubble, the most prominent global bubble in 
generations, was engendered by low interest rates," he said, but "it was 
long-term rates that galvanized prices, not the overnight rates of 
central banks." Long-term rates are largely set in global financial 
markets and reflect investors' demand for Treasury bonds and competing 
instruments, such as Fannie and Freddie mortgage bonds.

As the housing bubble was building in the mid-2000s, Mr. Greenspan 
frequently noted a "conundrum" that long-term rates were inexplicably 
low, did not seem to reflect the increasing risks of bond investments 
and had become divorced from their traditional linkage to short-term 
rates, which the Fed started to raise in 2004.

Mr. Greenspan theorized that the big drop in long-term rates was the 
result of enormous cash surpluses being amassed by China and other East 
Asian countries from their earnings on foreign trade, much of which was 
invested in U.S. Treasury bonds and mortgage securities, drawing down 
long-term rates. His analysis is widely viewed as correct today in 
pinpointing a key cause of the housing bubble.

Mr. Greenspan's prescience on such matters lends credibility to his 
testimony. But the former Fed chairman continued to largely reject 
charges that he personally played a critical role in the run-up to the 
crisis by not using the Fed's regulatory authority to set standards for 
subprime lending while frequently urging Congress not to regulate the 
complex and fast-growing markets for derivative securities such as 
credit default swaps in the 1990s.

Mr. Greenspan acknowledged he made "an awful lot of mistakes" in his 21 
years in office, though he claimed to be right about 70 percent of the 
time.

He said that credit default swaps, a kind of insurance on risky 
mortgages that played a pivotal role in bringing down Lehman Brothers 
Holdings Inc. and American International Group Inc. in the September 
2008 events that triggered the global crisis, were only a tiny share of 
the derivatives markets when he cautioned against regulation in the late 
1990s and were not of much concern to regulators at the time.

"We did not see the risks until after the Lehman bankruptcy," when the 
unraveling of derivatives contracts contributed to the collapse in the 
economy and markets worldwide, he said. After the debacle, he said, it 
became clear the derivatives markets and the whole financial system were 
drastically undercapitalized and that the principal response by 
government should be to substantially increase the capital and liquidity 
requirements of all globally operating financial firms.

Mr. Greenspan's successor, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, remarked 
separately in a speech to a Dallas business group Wednesday that while 
the worst of the debacle is over, "We are far from being out of the 
woods. Many Americans are still grappling with unemployment or 
foreclosure or both."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/08/greenspan-links-fannie-freddie-to-crisis/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_must-read-stories-today

or

http://tinyurl.com/y9qj6rv

#---------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4bbe29f4.9090...@mail.smvfp.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to