Michael Oke, II wrote: > He and his representatives have apologized to many about the current > stance taken by Arizona. I'm going to have to make the guess that he, > nor his representatives, have read the federal law that the used to > create their implementation. > > ::michael > > Michael Madigan wrote: >> A commander who refuses to seal the borders could be considered treasonous >>
You can tell this ass has never seen real action. Please, someone with some experience tell the dumb ass what will happen to him if he questions decisions up the chain of command. You can't have it both ways, either you can question whatever you want in whatever situation (which would make some previous rep posts either stupid or ), or you can't question your leadership in a time of war and crisis. CHOOSE !!! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4bf52f4f.40...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
