even if they destroy everything that we hold near and dear?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Leafe" <e...@leafe.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Is $1200 a month "plenty"?


> On May 20, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
>
>> Guess that simplifying it like that makes it easy to ignore the problem.
>>  A broken immigration system that nobody seems willing to try to fix.
>> In fact, Obama stood and said, not a day or two ago, that a country is
>> not defined by it's borders.  It's not?  Since when?
>
> So let me follow: when our country was founded and our Constitution 
> written, it had borders. Since then the borders are different, and since 
> borders define a country, we are now a different country than the one that 
> created the Constitution.
>
> It must be a different country, because for most of the time between then 
> and now there was no limit to who could immigrate: you just showed up, and 
> unless you showed signs of TB or other disease, you were allowed to enter.
>
>> Those individuals need to be treated as the terrorists they are and
>> dealt with in the same manner as any other terrorist.  I don't care
>> whose name they invoke while carrying out their looney plans.
>
>
> And someone who works hard and cares for their family should be treated 
> like a model citizen, whether or not they have papers.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/da3dfe5add2e4202b7167dd35a424...@bierschw6ca469
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to