http://bit.ly/9ZPss9

- - -
This was blatant dishonesty by the administration, on an Orwellian
scale. In defense of a policy that has all the earmarks of mindless
panic, that penalizes firms and individuals guilty of no wrongdoing
and that will worsen rather than improve our energy situation.
Ineffective thuggery.
...
But the Constitution does not command "no person . . . shall . . . be
deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law
except by the decision of a person as wise and capable as Kenneth
Feinberg." The Framers stopped at "due process of law."

Obama doesn't. "If he sees any impropriety in politicians ordering
executives about, upstaging the courts and threatening confiscation,
he has not said so," write the editors of the Economist, who then
suggest that markets see Obama as "an American version of Vladimir
Putin." Except that Putin is an effective thug.
- - -

All this was knowable two years ago. What a shame it had to happen, to
prove my points.

- Publius

-- 

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to