On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:17 -0400, "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]> wrote: > Getting source code that you can't copy/edit/modify is worse than not getting > source code, because now you are open to copyright infringement accusations > if > your "learned" techniques borrow a little too heavily from their code. > I would take the view that read-only source is better than no source, because it can be invaluable in debugging and getting round documentation deficiencies. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
