On Aug 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> That I consider a bug with the product. I like it when a change is
> made to a function and you re-build it the compiler will tell you that
> the function was also called from these other places as well and needs
> to be fixed or the method needs to be overloaded to fit both versions.
That would be true for early-binding languages. VFP is late-binding, so
by definition such compile-time checks are not possible.
You simply prefer more static languages. Noting that a dynamic language
doesn't work like a static language hardly merits the title of "bug".
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
