On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/9/2011 2:32 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Paul McNett<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 6/9/11 11:02 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: >>>> lnMax = 1024**3*2-1 >>>> IF lnAvailableMem> lnMax THEN >>>> lnAvailableMem = lnMax >>>> ENDIF >>> >>> How's about: >>> >>> lnAvailableMem = max(1024**3*2-1, m.lnAvailableMem) >>> >> ----------------------- >> >> How about min and not max? > > > Yes and yes. I drew it out a couple lines more than necessary for > clarity. <g> --------------
Do you get a better experience if you give 250 meg, 500 meg, 1 gig or 1.5 gig to VFP on a machine that is 3 gig or more? If there was 3 gig why give VFP 2 ? I know in SQL Server if you say use 7 gig of ram on an 8 gig serer it will TAKE it, map out it's use is what it does so no other app can grab it that is. Back to my initial question. Will VFP act better if you double it's ram from 500 meg to 1 gig on a machine that packs a lot of ram to begin with? If it doesn't why ever give more then 500 or 1 gig? -- Stephen Russell Unified Health Services 60 Germantown Court Suite 220 Cordova, TN 38018 Telephone: 888.510.2667 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
