On Oct 16, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Mike Copeland <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's what might be a crazy idea...
>
> Instead of using a local Windows or Linux box as a file server for DBF
> files...
>
> What if someone were to set up a Windows share drive from a Cloud drive
> service...like Rackspace offers?
>
> Would that file share source be
> a) acceptable to Foxpro for file locks, buffers, etc
> b) prone to index corruption
> c) speedy enough to serve the purpose?
>
> I'm thinking of a situation where multiple distant locations need to access
> the same files, with mostly reading but some updating.
>
> Anyone doing that? Anyone aware of a reason it would be a bad idea?
>
> I guess the main point would be the speed of the Internet connection...
I think the reliability of the connection would be more important,
although speed would also be important.
If all you wanted was a cloud drive, you could create a Linux instance
and use Samba to create a Windows share. Linux servers are a lot cheaper than
Windows.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
