Good heaven's to Betsy, NO. I would love to have tomorrow be the day
that I can finally say "DBFs...we don't got no stinkin' DBFs!"
It's just that rewriting code is always lagging behind need.
Mike
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Crazy?
From: M Jarvis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 10/16/2012 6:06 PM
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Mike Copeland <[email protected]> wrote:
Here's what might be a crazy idea...
Instead of using a local Windows or Linux box as a file server for DBF
files...
What if someone were to set up a Windows share drive from a Cloud
The right tool for the job.... Are you married to the idea of using DBF's ?
Unless I'm missing something this sounds like a perfect scenario for
client/server and backends like MS SQL Server, postgreSQL and/or
mySQL....
The classic 'reduced record set theory' tosses indexes out the window
in the first place...
Or am I just too late afternoon punchy to see what is really going on here?
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
