I know that your explanation works because the dictionary defines & as u&v y
↔ u v y .
What I am trying to do is sort out a sequence for developing concepts in
mathematics education. A starting point is Easy J. Also. I favor explicit
definitions using 13 : as they clearly indicate the placement of arguments.
However, students who become interested in J can look at the tacit verbs and
begin to see a more terse version of the language.
So, if I begin to embrace & to form a hook like =&{: and it is equivalent
to [:={: and I enter it as ([:={:) in an explicit definition, I'd like it to
work and also both versions should display in a similar fashion in a tree.
As I typed that last paragraph I wondered if I really need y somewhere in my
explicit definition.
Thanks for your thoughts as they have forced me to continue to ponder this
issue.
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:programming-boune
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aai
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 4:01 AM
taTo: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] stitching matrices
If you insist in a version of
(=&{: |.)
with caps then you'll have to use something like this (written out version)
LAT=: 13 :'( {: x ) = {: |. y'
LAT
([: {: [) = [: {: [: |. ]
Then insert this into my cleaned code (thanks to Raul):
zlav=:[: ;([: < LAT"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
A zlav B
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1
2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
zlav f.
[: ; ([: < (([: {: [) = [: {: [: |. ])"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
On 22-10-12 03:46, Linda Alvord wrote:
> Check your message below, Raul, which indicate that both m and n should work
> on your new version:
>
> i=:[: ;([: < (=&{: |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
> i
> [: ; ([: < (=&{: |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
> A i B
> 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1
> 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1
> 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
> 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
> 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
>
>
> m=: 13 :';x ([:< (([:={: :[:) |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _ y'
> m
> [: ; ([: < (([: = {: :[:) |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
> A m B
> |domain error: m
> | A m B
> n=: 13 :';x ([:< (([:={: :[:) |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _ y'
> n
> [: ; ([: < (([: = {: :[:) |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
> A n B
> |domain error: n
> | A n B
>
> Spacing of [:={: similar to =&{: would be geat.
> So I could write an explicit definition of o that will have the
> following result and produce the correct result that i does.
>
>
> o=:
> [: ; ([: < ([:={: |.)"1 # (, }.)"1)"1 _
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raul
> Miller
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] stitching matrices
>
> If you actually wanted to only be using monadic definitions for f and g,
> these would be equivalent definitions:
>
> f=: =&{: :[:
>
> g=: ([:={:) :[:
>
> Here, you would be declaring that these verbs have empty dyadic domains.
>
> You could even get away with
>
> g=: [:={: :[:
>
> (Do you see why?)
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am using them monadically.
>>
>> Linda
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of km
>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 2:54 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] stitching matrices
>>
>> Identical?
>>
>> f =: =&{:
>> g =: [:={:
>> 1 4 f 2 3 4
>> 1
>> 1 4 g 2 3 4
>> |domain error: g
>> | 1 4 g 2 3 4
>>
>> Kip Murray
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2012, at 1:11 AM, "Linda Alvord" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a problem that bothers me about this example before I leave it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> First establish that =&{: and [:={: are identical and compare
>>> tree and boxed versions:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ]'A B'=:3|L:0(([:<i.)"1)3 5,:5 4
>>>
>>> ----------T-------┐
>>> │0 1 2 0 1│0 1 2 0│
>>> │2 0 1 2 0│1 2 0 1│
>>> │1 2 0 1 2│2 0 1 2│
>>> │ │0 1 2 0│
>>> │ │1 2 0 1│
>>> L---------+--------
>>>
>>> f=:=&{:
>>>
>>> g=:[:={:
>>>
>>> 5!:4 <'f'
>>>
>>> -- =
>>> -- & -+- {:
>>>
>>> 5!:4 <'g'
>>>
>>> -- [:
>>> --+- =
>>> L- {:
>>>
>>> B
>>>
>>> 0 1 2 0
>>> 1 2 0 1
>>> 2 0 1 2
>>> 0 1 2 0
>>> 1 2 0 1
>>>
>>> f B
>>>
>>> 1 0 0 1
>>> 0 1 0 0
>>> 0 0 1 0
>>>
>>> g B
>>>
>>> 1 0 0 1
>>> 0 1 0 0
>>> 0 0 1 0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now look at two "trees":
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> elm=: 13 :'((=&{:)|.)"1 y'
>>>
>>> oak=: 13 :'(([:={:)|.)"1 y'
>>>
>>> 5!:4 <'elm'
>>>
>>> -- =
>>> -- & -+- {:
>>> ----+- |.
>>> -- " -+- 1
>>>
>>> 5!:4 <'oak'
>>>
>>> -- [:
>>> -----+- =
>>> ----+ L- {:
>>> -- " -+ L- |.
>>> L- 1
>>>
>>> 5!:2 <'elm'
>>>
>>> --------------T-T-┐
>>> │---------T--┐│"│1│
>>> ││--T-T--┐│|.││ │ │
>>> │││=│&│{:││ ││ │ │
>>> ││L-+-+---│ ││ │ │
>>> │L--------+---│ │ │
>>> L-------------+-+--
>>>
>>> 5!:2 <'oak'
>>>
>>> ---------------T-T-┐
>>> │----------T--┐│"│1│
>>> ││---T-T--┐│|.││ │ │
>>> │││[:│=│{:││ ││ │ │
>>> ││L--+-+---│ ││ │ │
>>> │L---------+---│ │ │
>>> L--------------+-+--
>>>
>>> B
>>>
>>> 0 1 2 0
>>> 1 2 0 1
>>> 2 0 1 2
>>> 0 1 2 0
>>> 1 2 0 1
>>>
>>> elm B
>>>
>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>
>>> oak B
>>>
>>> ran with error:
>>> |domain error: oak
>>> | oak B
>>> |[-16] c:\users\owner\j701-user\temp\42.ijs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not troubled by the fact that these results are different. I am
>>> bothered that their differences do not appear in the tree and boxed
>>> version, because I expect them both to be elm trees!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If these versions don't show any differences shouldn't the results
>>> agree. I think the tree versions must be missing some way to tell them
>>> apart.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Linda
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Linda
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> From: <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> [ <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raul
>>> Miller
>>>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:30 AM
>>>
>>> To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] stitching matrices
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Linda Alvord <
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> G B
>>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>> H B
>>>> ran with error:
>>>> |domain error: H
>>>> | H B
>>>> |[-30] c:\users\owner\j701-user\temp\37.ijs
>>>
>>>> G WORKS! H DOESN'T!
>>>
>>>> How can I write the function H without & and get 1 1 1 1 ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's G B
>>>
>>> ((=&{:)|.)"1 $~&5 4 i.3
>>>
>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here, I rephrase G by eliminating the &
>>>
>>> (({:@[ = {:@])|.)"1 $~&5 4 i.3
>>>
>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that I am testing the result at each step, here, to make sure
>>> I've not made any bad assumptions (for example, hypothetically
>>> speaking some intermediate results in these kinds of transformations
>>> might need some explicit treatment of rank).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here, I further rephrase G by also eliminating both of the @
>>> conjunctions
>>>
>>> ((([: {: [) = ([: {: ]))|.)"1 $~&5 4 i.3
>>>
>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here, I simplify slightly by using a hook
>>>
>>> (((([: {: [) = ]) {:)|.)"1 $~&5 4 i.3
>>>
>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here, I simplify again by using a cross hook
>>>
>>> (((= {:)~ {:) |.)"1 $~&5 4 i.3
>>>
>>> 1 1 1 1 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Good enough?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Raul
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> -
>>>
>>> For information about J forums see
>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> -
>>>
>>> For information about J forums see
>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> - For information about J forums see
>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - For information about J forums see
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - For information about J forums see
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
@@i = Arie Groeneveld
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
