Not a problem, but most likely not until Monday.
On Mar 9, 2013 11:07 AM, "Dan Bron" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you!  I don't want to ask too much, but is it possible to compile a
> 64-bit version?
>
> -Dan
>
> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
>
> On Mar 9, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Thomas Costigliola <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > For those interested in trying out the extensions there is now a 32 bit
> > windows j.dll available.
> >
> > PLEASE NOTE that the original links have changed. The patches and binary
> > can now be found at
> >
> > http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j
> >
> > These are provided under the GPLv3, AS IS with NO WARRANTY. Use at your
> OWN
> > RISK. Enjoy!
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>> Something is cooking, stay tuned...
> >>
> >> This is it!  First, I would like to thank Eric Iverson for his easy
> >> approach to deal with the necessary legal hurdles and to Roger Hui for
> his
> >> professional assistance and guidance (however, we are entirely to blame
> for
> >> any misconceptions in the design of these extensions).  We, at my
> company,
> >> have been committed for more than a decade to implementing production
> >> systems in pure fixed tacit J code (that is, with no pronouns,
> pro-verbs,
> >> pro-adverbs, pro-conjunctions, copulas (assignments) or explicit
> >> definitions).  The code is generated tacitly and to facilitate this
> process
> >> we have, over these years, added proprietary extensions to the language.
> >>
> >> We are releasing some of these extensions.   The subject of this message
> >> was "J tacit extensions" but I changed my mind hoping to attract the
> >> attention of contributors interested in functional programming and
> >> function-level programming.   Personally, I think it is unfortunate that
> >> Boyko decided not to participate anymore in the forums and I hope he
> would
> >> reconsider his decision.  For me tacit concepts came first and
> functional
> >> programming concepts followed as a consequence later on but I am,
> somewhat
> >> self-confessed, functionally illiterate ( see,
> >>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2010-November/021108.html )
> >> and I do not mind being educated, on the contrary, just be gentle
> [wink].
> >> Seriously, we are interested in how those concepts could enhance, and be
> >> implemented in the context (and mostly in the context) of, J.  We
> welcome
> >> comments and feedback on these extensions and further suggestions for
> >> future extensions.
> >>
> >> The four extensions released are:
> >>
> >> 0.  Scope for recursion (foreign adverb 103!:0 )
> >> The motivation, quoting from "tacit verbs to calculate the number of
> angels
> >> dancing on
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to