Here's one other note.
If I was concerned about the "labels" on the items in your xml file, I'd do
it as a second pass.
Perhaps:
require 'xml/sax/x2j'
x2jclass 'freecelllabels'
'Items' x2jDefn
/ := Table : Table=: i.0 0
dict := Table=: Table,Row : Row=: ''
key := Row=: Row,<y
)
With example use:
process_freecelllabels_ sample
+----+--------+----------+-----+------+
|date|duration|gameNumber|moves|result|
+----+--------+----------+-----+------+
|date|duration|gameNumber|moves|result|
+----+--------+----------+-----+------+
Then I could sort each row based on its labels, or extract out data
corresponding to certain labels, or whatever.
In your case, of course, this is unnecessary and therefore a waste of
effort.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Brian Schott <schott.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
> That helps a lot.
>
> This showed me that x2jElm is a conjunction.
>
> x2jElm
> 2 : 0
> x2jElmLoc=: x2jElmLoc,<,m
> x2jElmDef=: x2jElmDef`(v f.)
> )
>
> And this showed me that the next result is a new verb's atom
> representation.
> I am still way thinking about how the line ` '/' x2jElm (3 : 0)` which has
> no `=:` at the end, can produce a useful result. In a similar manner the
> code I could not make work had no `:=` at the end of the first line, but
> produced a useful result. I am struggling to understand that concept. That
> is still mind blowing for me. I mean, I see the `=:` inside the conjunction
> x2jElm, and I suppose that is where the assignment is being done, but that
> is some fancy code.
>
> Thanks for your clarifications.
>
> '/' x2jElm (3 : 0)
> Result
> :
> Result=: ''
> )
> +---------------------------+
> |+-+-----------------------+|
> ||:|+-----+---------------+||
> || ||+-+-+|+-+-----------+|||
> || |||0|3|||0|Result ||||
> || ||+-+-+|| |: ||||
> || || || |Result=: ''||||
> || || |+-+-----------+|||
> || |+-----+---------------+||
> |+-+-----------------------+|
> +---------------------------+
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, let's recap.
> >
> > Here's the code you quoted:
> >
> > x2jDefn_nifxml_
> > 1 : 0
> > for_i. <;._2 (0 : 0) do.
> > 'nm df'=. ':=' splitstring >{.'NB.' splitstring >i
> > 'mn dy'=. dltb each 2 {. ' : ' splitstring df
> > nm=. dltb nm
> > if. 0=#dy do. nm x2jChar (3 : mn)
> > elseif. 0=#mn do. nm x2jElm (4 : dy)
> > elseif. do. nm x2jElm (3 : (mn;':';dy)) end.
> > end.
> > i.0 0
> > )
> >
> > 'Items'x2jDefn_nifxml_
> > / := Result : Result=: ''
> > compound := cEnd y : x cStart y
> > add := aEnd y : x aStart y
> > add := aChr y
> > )
> >
> > The consequence of executing this code is something like this:
> >
> > '/' x2jElm (3 : 0)
> > Result
> > :
> > Result=: ''
> > )
> >
> > 'compound' x2jElm (3 :0)
> > cEnd y
> > :
> > x cStart y
> > )
> >
> > 'add' x2jElm (3 :0)
> > aEnd y
> > :
> > x aStart y
> > )
> >
> > 'add' x2jChar (3 :0)
> > aChr y
> > )
> >
> > Put differently, the x2jElm code runs for the specified elements. The
> > monadic definition runs for the close of the element and the dyadic
> > definition runs for the opening element. The '/' gives basically the same
> > effect as a startDocument/endDocument pair.
> >
> > Meanwhile, the x2jChar code gets the characters inside the element
> (inside
> > the <add> element, in this case).
> >
> > Does that help? Or am I missing your question?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> >
> > --
> (B=)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
