Yes, the old forms (c0 a1) and (a0 c1 a2) are back, lev and dex are are not provided but they can defined easily as,
lev=. [ conj dex=. ] conj * lev + * * dex + + See http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 for more details (only the definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly modified for the release). On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Brian Schott <[email protected]> wrote: > Will these train extensions reenable some of the trains involving adverbs > and conjunctions, that were de-committed in J several years ago? Or will > the newer such trains behave differently from or independently of those > gone? > > (And what about the conjunctions dex and lev?) > > -- > (B=) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
