</ is not a gerund--it's just a verb. This case is handled here:

http://jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d530v.htm

To get to this page, you have to click on the link that says "u}" in the
row for } on the vocabulary page.

Marshall

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 08:05:03PM +0200, Erling Hellenäs wrote:
> This one beats me. </ is a gerund that modifies y?
> 
> </1 2 3,:2 2 2
> 
> 1 0 0
> 
> 1 0 0}1 2 3,:2 2 2
> 
> 2 2 3
> 
> 
> I couldn't understand that from reading the manual.
> 
> I guess it's a joke.
> 
> /Erling
> 
> On 2014-07-07 15:09, R.E. Boss wrote:
> >look at 'Item Amend':
> >
> >    </} 1 2 3,:2 2 2
> >2 2 3
> >
> >
> >R.E. Boss
> >
> >(Add your info to http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Community/Demographics )
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: [email protected] [mailto:programming-
> >>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raul Miller
> >>Sent: maandag 7 juli 2014 12:33
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Tacit J and indexed replacement
> >>
> >>Another approach for this is:
> >>    (x*-.q)+y*q
> >>
> >>Sadly, that only works when x and y are numeric. Boxes and literals do
> >>not have zero and 1 values (hypothetically "fill" could be zero, but
> >>"1" is harder to rationalize.)
> >>
> >>A variant which uses amend might be:
> >>    (q#y) (I.q)} x
> >>
> >>This only works when x and y are rank 1, but you could also use
> >>something like this for higher ranked arrays:
> >>    ($q)$ (q#&,y) (I.,q)} ,x
> >>
> >>(I hope I didn't make too many mistakes this time. I'm running without
> >>any corrective support.)
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>--
> >>Raul
> >>
> >>On 7/7/14, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>Hi all !
> >>>
> >>>About the problem I want to solve.
> >>>
> >>>Generally you compare some arrays and you want to replace part of one of
> >>>them with info from the other or from some other array of the same
> >>>dimensions?
> >>>
> >>>I found a solution not using Amend:
> >>>
> >>>NB. x and y are arrays of the same rank
> >>>
> >>>NB. q is a boolean, also of this rank
> >>>
> >>>NB. The expression merges x and y.
> >>>
> >>>NB. Where q is TRUE it picks from y, otherwise x
> >>>
> >>>NB. q {"0 1 x,"0 y
> >>>
> >>>1 2 3(< {"0 1 [ ,"0 ])2 2 2
> >>>2 2 3
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>A similar solution using Amend. I'm sure it can be improved, just I
> >>>didn't do it yet. I didn't try it for the general case.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>NB. Amend
> >>>
> >>>NB. x (v0`v1`v2)} y ↔ (x v0 y) (x v1 y)} (x v2 y)
> >>>
> >>>1 2 3(> # [)`(> # [: i. [: $ ])`(])}2 2 2
> >>>2 2 3
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I think what makes Amend tricky is that you(as Ric says) need three
> >>>inputs. To get them into the tacit expression you have to put two of
> >>>them together in one noun.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>There are probably other solutions using sort.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Trying the same expression with a version of Raul's Amend:
> >>>
> >>>amende=: (0 {:: [)`(1 {:: [)`]}
> >>>
> >>>1 2 3((> (# ; [: (# i.&$) [ ) [) amende ])2 2 2
> >>>
> >>>2 2 3
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Some bug causes Thunderbird to reformat my mails. Hope you get them
> >>right.
> >>>I'm looking for something more general than this :)
> >>>
> >>>1 2 3 >. 2 2 2
> >>>
> >>>2 2 3
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>/Erling
> >>>
> >>>On 2014-07-07 05:58, Raul Miller wrote:
> >>>>Since it'w nagging at me (and this is still unteted code :/), here's
> >>>>what I currently think i should have said:
> >>>>     amend=: (0:{::])`(1:{::])`(2:{::])}~
> >>>>
> >>>>The trailing ~ because I need the dyad from the resulting verb, and
> >>>>the trailing ] on each because those verbs need to ignore one of the
> >>>>resulting arguments.
> >>>>
> >>>>Sadly, my fingers (and "quick memory") keep forgetting this.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>For information about J forums see
> >>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to