Nothing prevents you from renaming either to whatever you want.

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:

> For the j debian deb, it uses the name ijconsole.
>
> On 14 Dec, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Andrew Pennebaker <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > For those of us who like both J and Java on PATH, it would be nice to
> have
> > a simple name change.
> >
> > How about *jrepl*? Or just *j*?
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:15 PM, chris burke <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> For many of us, it is the more popular binary...
> >>
> >> However, there is usually no need for the J installation to be on the
> path,
> >> so the J jconsole can be called via a shell script or batch file, or
> >> symlinked to another name on the path. This should avoid conflict with
> the
> >> Java binary.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Pennebaker <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Could we rename our jconsole to something that doesn't clash with a
> more
> >>> popular binary?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Andrew Pennebaker
> >>> www.yellosoft.us
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Andrew Pennebaker
> > www.yellosoft.us
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to