Doing :
(^&_2) d. _1 fails, in the sence that the result is
[
which seems odd. (_2 can be replaced with any neg integer with the same
result). I do not know how I should interpret this.Clearly the result is not
correct. But I would have thought J's d. conjunction could have figured out the
correct answer
_1&*@:(^&_1)
since it can figure out the correct antiderivative of more difficultfunctions,
like ^. .Anyway, I would like ot know if this is a bug with J or I am doing
something wrong. Both the dictionary adn NUVOC don't seem to shed light on this.
Regards,Jon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
