On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:15 PM, greg heil <[email protected]> wrote: >>i wrote my undergraduate thesis (in APL) using the manipulation of Boolean >>matrices (categories, and many other algebra objects - with arbitrarily large >>sizes). i always disliked J because of its avowed anti-Boolean typology. >>Another thing to be worked around.
Boolean means different things to different people. There's George Boole's approach, for example, and there's later work which constrains the scope to truth values. Which are you talking about, here? And, why do you call J's approach "anti-Boolean"? (We can take this to chat, if that helps - if we won't be discussing programming.) Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
