"It" being the & derived verb. In other words, this also does not crash J:
cocurrent^:0 '' But this does: cocurrent&'' 0 So I expect that &'s implementation of ^:0 is interacting badly with 18!:4. It would be fun to track down exactly why this is happening... Thanks, -- Raul On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:54 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <[email protected]> wrote: > crash would not happen if this was the definiton > > > cocurrent_z_ =: 18!:4@boxxopen : [: > > > > problem is just that its being called dyadically. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: bill lam <[email protected]> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 8:39 AM > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] cocurrent in explicit train crashes > > I can replicate the crash. it can simplify to > > cocurrent&'base' 0 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
