> > On 6 May 2016, at 10:53 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I would go with first version. What don't you like about it?
Thanks - I don't particularly like using explicit rank. It also fails on the atom case It's also not particularly fast: 6!:2 '(?1e6#5) %^:(0~:])"0 (?1e6#5)' 0.703749 On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Ric Sherlock <[email protected]> wrote: > How about: > > 3 2 4 (% * 0 ~: ]) 6 0 3 > > 0.5 0 1.33333 > > Nice! 6!:2 '(?1e6#5) (% * 0 ~: ]) (?1e6#5)' 0.0489602 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
