The 'no loops' code is the original with the while/for constructs removed.
Sent from my iPad > On Apr 21, 2017, at 11:04, [email protected] wrote: > > Henry - regarding the neural network code I posted in wierdness #2, some > quick and dirty timing tests: > > No loops. Loops. Ratio > 805: 0.00181 0.01067 5.9 > 806: 0.00191 0.025 13 > Ratio: 1.06 2.34. 2.21 > > Loops means 10 'while' loops within which are about 20 'for' loops. > Incredibly it seems that the presence of the loop control constructs is > responsible for the performance degradation. > > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 20:19, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> name =: verb define >> smoutput 'time at point 1: ' , ": 6!:1'' >> NB. do something >> smoutput 'time at point 2: ' , ": 6!:1'' >> NB. etc. >> ) >> >> untested >> >> Henry Rich >> >> >> >> >>> On 4/20/2017 8:15 PM, Michael Goodrich wrote: >>> Henry >>> >>> You could save me some time if you could post a code example >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. >> http://www.avg.com >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
