Thank you
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:48 PM, David Mitchell <[email protected]>
wrote:
> It ran in J64-804
>
>
> On 5/16/2017 18:09, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
>
>> 0. Wicked Crash in JQt805/806
>>
>> Cloak=. ((5!:1)@:<'Cloak')Cloak=. (0:`)(,^:)
>> 'evoke fix amper'=. <@:Cloak "0@:;: '`: f. &'
>> train=. evoke&6 f.
>> an=. <@:((,'0') ,&< ])
>>
>> indet=. '' ($ ,) 128!:5 NB. Is Indeterminate?
>> eval=. {. train@:, an@:((train :: ])&.>)@:}.
>> body=. ([ amper >@:{.)@:([ , <@:])`(eval@:}.@:[)@.(indet @:])
>> GENOME=. <@:fix'body'
>>
>> vs=. GENOME&body f.
>> S=. vs ]`'' NB. Strand notation (_. is used as a guard)
>>
>> S 'this' 'is' 'strand' 'notation' 0 a: (a.{~97+i.10) _.
>> ┌────┬──┬──────┬────────┬─┬──┬──────────┐
>> │this│is│strand│notation│0│┌┐│abcdefghij│
>> │ │ │ │ │ ││││ │
>> │ │ │ │ │ │└┘│ │
>> └────┴──┴──────┴────────┴─┴──┴──────────┘
>>
>> S (body f.)`'' _. NB. Nothing is produced...
>> S NB. ... J805/806 Crashes!
>>
>> It runs fine in a custom J (Jx804) based on J804. Can anybody confirm
>> that it runs in J04 (I do not have one handy)?
>>
>> assert (,GENOME) -: S (body f.)`'' _.
>>
>> The problem seems to be related to in-place operations; but, I have no
>> idea if it only can occur in wicked contexts or not.
>>
>>
>> 1. Memory leak in JQt805/806
>>
>> This is one hurdle preventing us from moving an application from Jx804
>> to Jx805/Jx806,
>>
>> ]^:0: ;/i.1e6
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
