Pepe, many thanks for swift reply
Regards,
Roger
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Jose Mario Quintana <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Roger, at the address I mentioned (
> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx0/index.html ) you can find a
> link to the article J Functional Programming Extensions that you might find
> interesting. (There is also a J Cheatsheet.)
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:19 AM, roger stokes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Louis, I am with you on this.
> >
> > Pepe, I would be very interested to see some introductory documentation
> > of your project
> >
> > Regards
> > Roger
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Louis de Forcrand <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > A lot has been said on these forums about Jx and Unbox.
> > > They are unofficial J interpreters (with extensions to the language),
> are
> > > they not?
> > > Are they publicly available? I couldn't find anything about them on
> > Google
> > > except older messages in the forum archives, but then again
> unfortunately
> > > this language's name makes it sometimes hard to look up on the web.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Louis
> > >
> > > > On 16 Jul 2017, at 15:37, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sure, and the biggest problem here is the use of globals for
> arguments.
> > > >
> > > > The verbs themselves can be pure, but all we're really doing is
> > > > rearranging the deck chairs.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Raul
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jose Mario Quintana
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> At least we agree, I think, on one thing " in explicit programming
> > > >> [typically] names refer to arguments while in tacit programming they
> > do
> > > >> not." Thus, is not just a matter of tacit aesthetics, there are
> some
> > > >> consequences which might be difficult to evade:
> > > >>
> > > >> ('`u v') =: +/`*:
> > > >> u@:v f.
> > > >> +/@:*:
> > > >>
> > > >> ('`u v') =:: +/`*: NB. Jx
> > > >> ┌───────┬──┐
> > > >> │┌─┬───┐│*:│
> > > >> ││/│┌─┐││ │
> > > >> ││ ││+│││ │
> > > >> ││ │└─┘││ │
> > > >> │└─┴───┘│ │
> > > >> └───────┴──┘
> > > >> u@:v f.
> > > >> +/@:*:
> > > >>
> > > >> ('`u v') is +/`*: NB.
> > > >> |domain error
> > > >> | (m) =:y
> > > >> is
> > > >> 1 : '(m)=:y'
> > > >>
> > > >> So, assuming I understood the intended use of your adverb is, I am
> > > afraid
> > > >> your adverb cannot be used without typical limitations.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
