multiple core support was not enabled during building j engine binary,
otherwise  gflop for j matrix product can be 2 or 3 times better depending
the number of core available.

On Thu, May 31, 2018, 2:39 AM Bill Heagy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Maybe related: latest j src, debian intel 32.  I just run this
> occasionally.  Ignore the flops: it's a slow machine.  However, it
> appears to do the computation ok, it just returns "0"'s for c2.
>
>
>
>     NB. from (email to jprogramming): bill lam <[email protected]>
>     NB. test and compare gigaflops with blas/lapack
>
>     dgemm=: 'liblapack.so.3 dgemm_ > n *c *c *i *i *i *d *d *i *d *i *d
> *d *i'&cd
>
>     mm=: 4 : 0
> k=. ,{.$x
> c=. (k,k)$1.5-1.5
> dgemm (,'N');(,'N');k;k;k;(,2.5-1.5);y;k;x;k;(,1.5-1.5);c;k
> c
> )
>
>     'A B'=:0?@$~2,,~4096
>     t1=: 6!:2'c1=: A+/ .*B'
>     echo ' GFlop ',~ 0j3": 2*(4096^3)%(t1)*1e9
> 0.456 GFlop
>     t1=: 6!:2'c2=: A mm B'
>     echo ' GFlop ',~ 0j3": 2*(4096^3)%(t1)*1e9
> 1.218 GFlop
>     echo c1-:c2
> 0
>     4!:55 ;: 'dgemm mm A B t1 c1 c2'
> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>
>
>
> Note the "0" on the comparison check at the end.
>
> On 2018-05-30 01:16 PM, J. Patrick Harrington wrote:
> > Eric,
> >   That's indeed correct. The output from j807 on the mac mini is wrong,
> > even though it dosen't crash:
> >     JVERSION
> > Engine: j806/j64nonavx/darwin
> > Release: commercial/2017-11-06T10:18:00
> > Library: 8.06.09
> > Qt IDE: 1.6.2s/5.6.3
> > Platform: Darwin 64
> > .... here's what it should do
> > ── (5 of 15) Examples ───────────────────────────────────────
> > Here is a simple example:
> > )
> >     fftw i.8
> > 28 _4j9.65685 _4j4 _4j1.65685 _4 _4j_1.65685 _4j_4 _4j_9.65685
> > ... and
> > require 'numeric'
> >     clean (dfft - fftw) i.8
> > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >
> > But under j807:
> >     JVERSION
> > Engine: j807/j64nonavx/darwin
> > Beta-e: commercial/2018-05-25T12:55:54
> > Library: 8.07.15
> > Qt IDE: 1.7.1/5.9.5
> > Platform: Darwin 64
> > .... we get
> > ── (5 of 15) Examples ───────────────────────────────────────
> > Here is a simple example:
> > )
> >     fftw i.8
> > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> > and ...
> > require 'numeric'
> >     clean (dfft - fftw) i.8
> > 28 _4j9.65685 _4j4 _4j1.65685 _4 _4j_1.65685 _4j_4 _4j_9.65685
> >
> > The results further along under j807 are just garbage, e.g.,
> >
> > ── (10 of 15) Examples (ctd) ────────────────────────────────
> > )
> >     A=: j./ ?. 1 + i. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
> >
> >     $A
> > 3 4 5 6 7 8
> >
> >     $B=: fftw A
> > 3 4 5 6 7 8
> >
> >     $C=: ifftw B
> > 3 4 5 6 7 8
> >
> >     +/ , clean A - C      NB. A matches C
> > 1.01974e8j3.05017e8
> >
> > On Wed, 30 May 2018, Eric Iverson wrote:
> >> My guess is that the lab always fails in 807 due to incorrect cd
> >> usage. The
> >> failure can be a crash or wrong answers.
> >>
> >> The lab running to completion does not mean that things are OK.
> >>
> >> Someone needs to follow the code carefully in order to correct the cd
> >> usage.
> >>
> >> One possibility is to step through 807 side-by-side with 806 and see
> >> where
> >> things go bad.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:53 AM, J. Patrick Harrington
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> My last message about my linux (Ubuntu) laptop with missing labs was my
> >>> error -- I had somehow started the j805 engine. Using the right files:
> >>>    JVERSION
> >>> Engine: j807/j64/linux
> >>> Beta-e: commercial/2018-05-25T11:59:34
> >>> Library: 8.07.15
> >>> Qt IDE: 1.7.1/5.5.1
> >>> Platform: Linux 64
> >>> Installer: J807 install
> >>>
> >>> I get the same crash after step 6 of the FFT as I do in windows 807.
> >>> It is
> >>> only on my mac mini that the lab runs correctly under 807. The lab
> works
> >>> OK on all machines under j806.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 30 May 2018, bill lam wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I can duplicate the crash on Windows. I should be related to cd
> >>>> changes in
> >>>> j807.But I can't understand the covering verbs  in fftw. It looked
> >>>> as if
> >>>> it
> >>>> is not well organized. Maybe someone can come to rescue.
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks like it just being lucky for no crash in linux and mac.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018, 5:38 PM 'Mike Day' via Programming <
> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Similar here for an avx machine,  running Windows 10,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> with processor: AMD A10-7300 :-
> >>>>>
> >>>>> JVERSION
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Engine: j807/j64/windows
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Beta-e: commercial/2018-05-25T12:07:57
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Library: 8.07.15
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Qt IDE: 1.7.1s/5.9.5
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Platform: Win 64
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Installer: J807 install
> >>>>>
> >>>>> InstallPath: c:/d/j807
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The FFT lab gets as far as displaying
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "── (9 of 15) Examples (ctd) ─────────────────────────────────
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In general, the arguments to fftw and ifftw are complex,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> multidimensional arrays.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The next section computes the FFT on a random complex,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 6-dimensional array of shape 3 4 5 6 7 8. This may take a few
> >>>>>
> >>>>> seconds to run.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> )"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and then crashing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FYI,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mike
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 29/05/2018 21:57, J. Patrick Harrington wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Just installed j64-807 (nonavx) on an old windows machine.
> >>>>> > Trying some things, I ran the Fast Fourier Transform lab. As soon
> >>>>> as it
> >>>>> > got to the part where it should compute a complex transform, it
> >>>>> crashes.
> >>>>> > That lab runs fine in under j64-806 (nonavx).
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Sat, 26 May 2018, Eric Iverson wrote:
> >>>>> >> The 807 beta-e zip install packages for windows/linux/macos are
> >>>>> >> available.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Henry has done a lot more work to exploit virtual blocks and to
> >>>>> make
> >>>>> >> better
> >>>>> >> use of cache memory.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> For details, see:
> >>>>> >> http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/ReleaseNotes/J807
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> This beta is stable and, except for production work, we urge you
> to
> >>>>> >> move to
> >>>>> >> it now.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Help make the final release solid!
> >>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> ----------
> >>>>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forum
> >>>>> s.htm
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > For information about J forums see
> >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to