I've never used this. On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 3:29 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think negative level is wrongly defined. (u L:(-r) y) applies u at > level ((L. y) -r), which measures from the bottom of the tree. What I > want is a form that applies u two levels down, say, which I can't get > now. I propose to change L: to do what I want. > > Has anyone found a use for L:(-r) using the current definition? > > My proposed change is described at > > https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Interpreter/Requests#Change_definition_of_negative_level_.28strawman.29 > > Henry Rich > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- Devon McCormick, CFA Quantitative Consultant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
