/(%:@:) untested.
you can also consider if easier the "semi-tacit": 1 : '%:@:(u/)' semi tacit because the explicit definition disappears after a verb is bound to this adverb. If you can avoid citing x and y arguments in an adverb, it works ambivalently as another advantage. On Monday, July 30, 2018, 4:32:59 p.m. EDT, Piet Google <[email protected]> wrote: Is there a tacit equivalent of the following t=: 1 : '%:@:(u/) y' Help much appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
