So if I edit the NuVoc to include that sentence from the dictionary, that would fix this issue?
Thanks, -- Raul On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:09 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > I decline to comment on what the Dictionary means, since NuVoc is > definitive. I agree with your expected results (the JE produces shape 0 > 10 for the first one). > > We disagree about what _ and __ would mean; perhaps they should mean > (length of axis)+1, but not (length of axis) IMO. > > Henry Rich > > On 11/1/2019 4:01 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > > Near as I can tell, from reading the dictionary, we should get: > > > > $(3,: 11) ];._3 ] 3 0 7 2 9 1 5 8 4 6 > > 0 11 > > $(3,: 10) ];._3 ] 3 0 7 2 9 1 5 8 4 6 > > 1 10 > > > > In both cases, we are looking for a sub array starting at index 3, the > > difference is the length of that sub array. But, also, in both cases, > > there are not enough elements in the array for a non-empty result. > > > > So... I do not disagree that these results should be different... > > > > It took me a bit before I realized that 0 was an integer multiple of > > 3. I'm a bit slow today. > > > > But _ and __ would be placeholders here for 10 and _10. There's no > > need to generalize any further. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
